Морозильная камера: фото, отзывы и характеристики.
antiNATOНа х.ж.н.и х.с в.
E-mail:
VVK@VK3109.spb.edu
Просмотр Гостевой Книги Read our Guestbook Запись в Гостевую Книгу Sign our
Guestbook

<Home Заставка page>

THE VERDICT: NATO IS A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION

Professor
Dr. Nikolai von Kreitor

NATO forces are the pawns of Satan

Archbishop Christodoulos,
The Leader
of the Greek Orthodox Church

The bombing war violates and shreds the basic provisions of the United Nations Charter and other conventions and treaties; the attack on Yugoslavia constitutes the most brazen international aggression since the Nazis attacked Poland to prevent "Polish atrocities" against Germans. The United States has discarded pretensions to international legality and decency, and embarked on a course of raw imperialism run amok.

Walter J. Rockler,
former prosecutor during the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal

To paraphrase the words of Lord Bertram Russell in his introductory statement at the First Russell War Crimes Tribunal Concerning American War Crimes in Vietnam one must say that the conscience of mankind has been profoundly disturbed by the war of aggression being waged by the United States and its satellites against Yugoslavia. The world is numbed by the arrogant brutality of the United States Government.

War crimes are the actions of powers whose arrogance leads them to believe that they are above the law. Might, they argue, is right....It is not enough to identify the criminal. The United States must be isolated and rendered incapable of further crimes, stated Lord Bertram Russell at the 1971 Stockholm session of the Russell Tribunal. (1)

With the war of aggression against Yugoslavia United States abrogated many treaties and obligations in international law including Article 2 of the UN Charter prohibiting use of force against sovereign states, The Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties forbidding the use of force to compel any state to sign an international agreement, and the Helsinki Final Act guaranteeing the boundaries of European states. During the course of the aggression against Yugoslavia United States and her satellites blatantly and deliberately committed war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity.

The verdicts rendered at the Yaroslavl and Kiev sessions of the Peoples War Crimes Tribunal, constituted by the All-Slavic Assembly, clearly show under the weight of overwhelming evidence presented, that US and other NATO countries committed war crimes during the recent war of aggression against Yugoslavia.

The Tribunal was established for the trial and punishment of the major war criminals of the NATO countries and it has the power to try any persons, who , acting in the interests of the NATO countries, committed the following crimes:

(a) Crimes against Peace: namely planning, preparation , initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements and assurances, or participation in a common plan and conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing.

(b) War Crimes: namely, violation of the laws or customs of war.

(c) Crimes against Humanity - murder, extermination and other inhuman acts committed against civilian population.

The Findings of the Tribunal and the Verdicts can be read bellow. The Defendants were found guilty of Crimes against Peace, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity. The Defendants were furthermore found guilty of Conspiracy to commit the aforementioned Crimes. The common plan or conspiracy embraced the commission of Crimes against Peace , in that the defendants planned, prepared , initiated and waged war of aggression, which was also war in violation of international treaties , agreements and assurances. In the development and course of the common plan or conspiracy it came to embrace the commission of war crimes , in that it contemplated , and the defendants determined upon and carried out , ruthless war against Yugoslavia and its civil population, in violation of the rules and customs of war.(Geneva Convention and Its Supplementary Protocols I and II)

The Defendants were furthermore